Sunday, April 22, 2012

Cabin in the Woods (***1/2 out of ****)

So here is the most entertaining movie of the year in a lot of ways. It's the best in its weird genre since Drag Me To Hell. The thing about about Cabin in the Woods is that it's everything a horror film should be if it goes to one end of the spectrum. There are two horror films in a way.Tthose built up with utter dread that are earth shattering terrifying (Ex. Alien) or they are entertaining in a variety of ways. Cabin in the Woods is hilarious, scary, fun, action packed, thrilling, sexy, original and familiar. Above all else it is what a good time at the movies should be.

Without going to much into the story (you need to see it for yourself, with no spoilers) it's a story you think you've seen before. A group of college students (every actor nailing their role) go up to a remote cabin... well in the woods.... for some partying and fun. It's something straight out of The Evil Dead. However things aren't what they seem. You can speculate where the story goes from here, I'm sure the film will throw something else at you to keep you pleasantly guessing.

Cabin in the Woods is widely original and familiar at the same time (like I said earlier). The film seems to take just about every horror cliche and make it wickedly exciting. The film is devilishly meta in that the characters and the audiences both are aware of how things will play out. It's the most fun you might have at the theater all year long.

***1/2 out of ****

Lockout (** out of ****)

Standard action movie right here. Nothing more and nothing less. Guy Peace plays Snow, a wrongly convicted prisoner in the year 2037. In this not so distant future, all prisoners are sent to space in a giant space station jail. A riot occurs and the prisoners take the station as well as hostages. One of them is the president's daughter who is there on a goodwill mission (you gotta love that cliche). Snow, considered the best at what he does, is assigned to get into the station and rescue Emilie (Maggie Grace). The film has a nice look to it, the space sets bring a fresh feel to the action movie. The fact the film more or less Snake Plissken in space gets some bonus points too. However the film is littered with plot holes that may be explained only through the audiences imagination. Snow is too wisecracking for his own good,  nothing special fight scenes, and rehashed cliches makes Lockout feel all to average, but not necessarily bad. Once again it's the standard action movie you see every month.

** out of ****

The Raid: Redemption (***1/2 out of ****)

Film as an art form should stimulate the mind in some sense. The Raid (As it was originally called) is a pure adrenaline trip. A take no prisoners, balls to the wall and ultimately kick-ass action film. An action film is art in a lot of ways. The fighting choreography is like a dance and The Raid has it all.

Twenty elite SWAT members head into an apartment building with a crime lord as their target. The apartment is haven for criminals were scrum can rent a room, no questions asked. The SWAT members move floor to floor to get to the top and capture the mastermind. Well things do go smoothly and a bloodbath wall happen. 

The Raid is a cerebral encounter. Pulse-pounding music, dazzling fight scenes and characters that appropriately fit their role. The story is bland, but the movie is meant to be watched as a thrill ride. The fight scenes are brutal, fun and brilliant all at the same time. The Raid is the action of the year, one of the best in ten years even.

***1/2 out ****

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Jeff, Who Lives At Home (*** out of ****)

The Duplass brother's make their films just right. They have an "Metteur en scene" (signature style) to filmmaking that is easy to love. Their films including The Puffy Chair and Cyrus all have this certain simplicity. They're all relative simple stories filled with characters that move with passive goals. Instead of creating giant problems, the Duplass brother's fill their stories with plain ideas and let the audience judge for themselves how attached they'll become to the story.

Jeff (Jason Segal) lives in his mother's (Susan Sarandon) basement smoking weed and watching Signs on repeat. He's looking for his destiny and any little connection to this goal is something worth chasing. He goes on a little errand one day that he believes will turn into the destiny he's been looking for. This goal causes him to cross paths with his brother Pat (Ed Helms) who suspects his wife (Judy Greer) is cheating on him.

Duplass Brothers are a mix of comedy and drama, but never does it lose its charm. Jeff, Who Lives At Home is not a feel good movie in a classic sense. Roger Ebert said it's a "sort of feel good movie". That seems about right. You'll laugh and come to care for these characters problems. That's it's goal and it success quite well.

*** out of ****

Wrath of the Titans (** out of ****)

Wrath of the Titans is film that plays tricks on the mind. Not in terms of a confusing story but through entertainment. Here is a film that contains actors with great talent. Sam Worthington, Roasmund Pike, Toby Kebbell, Edgar Ramirez, Bill Nighly, Danny Huston, Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson make Wrath of the Titans a kind of fun ride but only because of their presence. Their talent can't save a film that is barley strung together. Perseus (Sam Worthington) must stop Kronos from escaping Tartarus and along the way fights all sorts of Greek mythological creatures. However it's easy to wonder why certain actions aren't taken to avoid all this destruction (of course those plot holes can be solved through simple thinking, you won't expect that here). This is decently entertaining, contains some fun action scenes. However that doesn't mean it's a well constructed film. Just some occasional fun and then some waiting for more action since the story won't be stimulating you.

** out of ****

Sunday, March 25, 2012

21 Jump Street (*** out of ****)

This early in the year and I'm sure we're looking at one of the best comedies 2012 will offer. I personally love getting ti now. 21 Jump Street is hilarious...that's really it. A typical comedy should make you laugh and leave you entertained. This film does that gloriously. When rating the film compared to other comedies a nice strong 3/4 stars seems just right.

Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum are opposite style police offers who join a unit that infiltrates high schools with young looking officers. In their first assignment they must find a dealer that is distributing a powerful new drug. Dave Franco, Brie Larson and Ice Cube round up a truly funny supporting cast.

What I really want to talk about with this film is that it never takes itself seriously. Yes, most comedies do that. However 21 Jump Street clearly knows where action movies and comedies get wound up in creating drama that you know will be resolved eventually. Here is a film that makes jokes on these plot structures. Whether it be a joke referring to remakes being stupid (this is based on TV show if you didn't know), the logistics/expectations of explosions or that Channing Tatum looks far too old to be a high schooler the film aims for big laughs and succeeds If you're looking for just good old and uproarious fun well then look no further.

*** out of ****

The Hunger Games (*** out of ****)

A truly entertaining blockbuster normally contains elements of action, romance, strong characters, suspense, deep lore and perhaps above all else a sense of personal adventure. The Hunger Games works so well because it can properly utilizes each individually. People rewatch films, reread books and play through old video games because in some ways it's like visiting old friends. It's like sitting down with people you haven't spoke to in a while and even if the world and your life changes, they'll always be the same people that will never leave our hearts. The characters and story in this film are special in the way they engage the mind and take us on a roller coster of emotions. The Hunger Games is worth diving in head first with out any regrets.

Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) lives in District 12, an outlying settlement in service of an advanced capital city. To control the districts after a failed revolt, the capitol created "The Hunger Games". It is a brutal competition where 24 tributes (two form each district) are collected to fight to the death until one emerges victorious (however haunting that victory is). All of which is televised throughout the country However instead of strong and grounded adults, the competition calls for the tributes to be through the ages of 12-18. Katniss volunteers for "The Games" to save her sister and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) is selected as well. Off to the capitol they reluctantly go.

The districts are ruled in dystopian society. The capital is a ... interesting place. The districts are bland and mostly colorless but in the capitol everything is as flamboyant as possible. Class differences in films often deal with the manner in how everyone is dressed, The Hunger Games has taken that theory to a wondrous extreme. The capitol brings with it interesting and diverse personalities. Effrie Trinket (Elizabeth Banks) is  Kabuki like guide who shows Peeta and Katniss where to go and what to do. She believe treating these commoners to lavish areas is worth the price of being a tribute. Haymitch Abernathy (Woody Harrelson) acts as a mentor since he has actually won in the past. He drinks heavily, some it must be due to the guilt that he lived when so many others died. The rest of the reason to drink must come from guiding these young souls only to likely lead them to a horrible death. The tributes must collect sponsors (who will provide gifts in "The Games"), Cinna (Lenny Kravitz) acts a stylist to make Katniss and Peeta stand out in everyway possible. Standing out also means being interviewed by the king of flamboyant Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci). The competition is run by Seneca Crane (Wes Bentley) with a beard that The Devil might even where. All of these people operate under an iron gaze from President Snow (Donald Sutherland). The reason for listing most of these characters (There's Gale played Liam Hemsowrth too but he's all too vacant in this first installment)  is the story would seem empty without them. They collectively work to make a strong story all the better. 

"The Games" of course are brutal, violent, and probably to many viewers bought to watch. This all under a PG-13 rating. Let's be honest the film could work better with less restrictions. A bit more violence could have really driven home the message of the terror this competition is, but the point is still decently made and doesn't really need an R rating. Gary Ross the director knows what he's doing with creating a story, but it feels the action is lost on him a tad. A rather shaky camera makes it hard to follow certain scenes, not enough to the point of being absolute confusion, but distracting none the less. There is some romance between Katniss and Peeta, storyline wise it has great potential but it feels a tad lost on the film. (Spoilers Coming) If there is a romance fine, the film does well there. However there is themes in the story to make seem as these "star crossed lovers" actually play some of their own games with each other. This romance will attract sponsors, so why not play the angle? The question is where one ends and the other begins. In the film however the romance strand is much longer and dwarfs that of sponsor. Maybe that theory is just personal and shouldn't be reflected on the film.

The Hunger Games can bring audiences of all ages. The target market of the books was for young adults but the dystopian, sci-fi and philosophy will attract many who heard rumors of another love triangle and will now line up for the film instead of running way. Jennifer Lawrence really is the perfect actress right now. She can command a strong willed character in a blockbuster or indie film (Winter's Bone). You can even see her range in films such as Like Crazy and The Beaver. She easily commands the screen and is the film's biggest asset. The Hunger Games will have you shy away but wanting more at the same time.

*** out of ****
Two Notes: 1.) The three stars means this is a very good movie but could improve. I was very tempted to give it ***1/2 out of ****. It certainly was good enough in some areas, but I just couldn't in the end. So don't take the stars here too seriously, just know it has a big stamp of approval no matter what.
2.) Yes I've seen Battle Royal, The Truman Show, The Running Man. The Hunger Games has elements of all but there's a lot of talk that this is a rip off. Look just cause the last craze was Twilight and both films have two young males going after the same girl doesn't mean their the same. Let's judge The Hunger Games based on basic story structures and not other films.